2. How does it fit with Compass’ core beliefs of equality, solidarity, democracy, freedom, sustainability and well being?
Equality:
UN Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon, says, “Violence against women continues to persist as one of the most heinous, systematic and prevalent human rights abuses in the world”
Democracy/Freedom:
Women can never have full freedom, or participate fully in society, if they are abused at home, sexually assaulted, trafficked or simply scared to walk a certain route home at night.
Well-being:
Victims suffer physical injuries, mental health problems, social exclusion and drug and alcohol problems.
Solidarity:
Women and men must stand together to say that abuse of women and girls is not inevitable.
3. How does it build the institutions of social democracy, like social groups and collective and cooperative forms of ownership and control?
Women’s organisations have driven progress on violence against women over the last 4 decades and it is women’s organisations that hold the key to tackling violence against women today by:
- being funded to support victims to help them flee violence and rebuild their lives
- building networks and coalitions to campaign for change
- provide expertise to public bodies
- develop creative thinking about challenging attitudes to violence.
Women’s groups, unions, human rights groups and others can build a grassroots movement to create change but they need to be funded to do this!
4. How much will it cost or raise and where will any cost come from?
Violence against women costs £40billion each year, including the cost to the police, courts and health service. This is more than the MOD’s annual spend! So a world where women are not raped, trafficked or beaten would be richer, in many ways.
Some work needs to be funded, including public campaigns to change attitudes, and funding for Rape Crisis Centres and other services.
However, much can be done at little cost if tackling violence is mainstreamed into existing work, eg working with young people around consent to sex and healthy relationships, and training for frontline workers.
5. Which groups in the electorate are likely to support or oppose this measure? Is there any polling evidence you have on this?
There is overwhelming public support for a better way of tackling violence against women. YouGov polling for End Violence Against Women in July 2008 found that 84% of people in the UK support cross-government action to prevent and eradicate violence. The benefits are clear; to current and future victims who know the real cost, to the families of the 2 women a week killed by a partner or ex partner and to the frontline workers - police, hospital, social workers - who have to mop up this problem on a daily basis.
6. Is there a place or country where it’s worked? Please provide some information.
National plans are recognised internationally as the way to effectively tackle violence against women, hence the UN’s repeated calls for States to take this approach. Vice-President-elect Joe Biden authored the ground-breaking Violence Against Women Act in America which has channelled over $5billion to prevention programmes, domestic violence shelters and Rape Crisis centres.
Closer to home the Scottish government has been developing a strategic framework on violence against women for some time. This includes ring fenced funding for rape crisis centres resulting in the expansion of the rape crisis sector in Scotland.
7. What are the three main arguments in favour/against it?
In the UK, three million women experience violence each year and many more have experienced abuse in the past. Surveys show that half of young men think it’s ok to hit a woman or force her to have sex in certain circumstances.
It is difficult to think of a good argument for not taking action.
- Morally it is the right thing to do
- Inaction is extremely costly, both to society and to individual women
- We are obliged by international agreements to take action
So lets set out a roadmap for eradicating violence against women!
-
JENNIFER DREW
Girls and boys also need to be educated about how the media operates which reinforces narrow definitions of the social constructions of femininity and masculinities. Male violence against women and children does not occur within a vacuum. http://www.media-awareness/ca/english/ is a website which has been designed to assist teachers and children to understand in an age appropriate way how the media influences and reinforces narrow stereotypical beliefs concerning masculinities and femininities. Also, http://www.thegeenaadvisinstitute.org/ is another excellent website which focuses on helping girls and young women challenge media stereotypes and the immense damage being caused to women and girls’ well-being and self esteem, through the now normalised sexual commodification and sexual exploitation of women and girls by the media. Both these websites have material which can be incorporated into the educational system. Likewise Womankind has a project which has been successfully piloted wherein trained specialists go into schools and help teachers challenge the presumption that it is acceptable for boys to sexually harass, sexually abuse and even commit sexual violence against their female peers. Education is the key and it must challenge notions of what is presumed to be acceptable female and male behaviour before young women and young men become adults.
The mainstreaming of pornography is another huge problem and research shows a clear link between the mainstreaming of pornography and increasing younger and younger males engaging in group rape and filming their attacks on young and girls. Scottish Coalition Against Sexual Exploitation is an organisation which is currently working on this issue, so the principals are already in place. Only by engaging in mult-agency work will we challenge the now normalised acceptance of male violence against women and girls.
-
JENNIFER DREW
One of the main arguments against a multi-agency approach to male violence against women is what is often called the ‘backlash effect.’ Despite numerous research and evidence which has consistently shown that it is women and girls who are the ones who are subjected to male violence, we still hear and read claims that women and girls commit violence in equal numbers to males. Unless we challenge these claims, a large percentage of the UK population will continue to believe male violence against women is not a women’s human rights issue.
We need a gender sensitive approach rather than as at present a gender neutral one which effectively hides and invisibilises how and why male violence against women and girls occurs. The central reason for male violence against women and girls is because women and girls are still not accorded an equal societal status compared to males. Taking a gender neutral approach ensures the ‘playing field remains the same’ which means one wherein male power and male social authority is not challenged. Society is still organised wherein males as a group have higher economic and political power; the media continues to be male-dominated and male-centered. The only role models women and girls see reflected are those wherein women and girls are represented as men’s sexualised commodities.
Statistics and research will not alter societal beliefs unless we accept there is a gender imbalance with regards to power. Males hold greater power than females and males rather than females are considered the ones who are rational, objective and have supposedly higher intelligence. Discrimination against women and girls is now not overt but instead is covert which means it is much harde to challenge gender discrimination, but it can be achieved if we do not hide gender accountability and instead continue to use gender neutral language. Use of language does affect individuals’ perceptions and seeking to hide the gender of perpetrators is one very effective way of hiding and deflecting male accountability.
-
Laura
We desperately need ring fenced, guaranteed funding for rape crisis centres. As it stands they are massively underfunded and face the very real risk of collapse unless something is done about them – if it can be done in Scotland, why can’t it be done across the UK?
-
English isn’t my first language but you made me understand clearly, I appreciate that.
-
Great write up - five stars. I bookmarked this page. I am promoting my blog which is based around the topic of men’s health and we are also promoting a few men’s sexual health related products like Vimax Pills, Vimax Extenders, Vimax Patches etc. Please check out my bog for more details.
-
adding to twitter this is great info.
-
Greetings from London. This is a cool site. I’m wondering if you have any advice about staying out of the friend zone with women? Honestly I’m sick of girls telling me they just want to be friends. Maybe I’m being too much of a nice guy?
-
This blog write-up gave me a whole load of ideas, many thanks for sharing

The default "Block" is always the title block for the post, that is where general comments are posted:

To comment on any "Block" within a post, click on the comments bar next to that block:

To view comments about a "Block" within a post, click on the yellow comment indicator next to that block:

August 26th, 2009 at 5:30 pm
English isn’t my first language but you made me understand clearly, I appreciate that.
November 27th, 2009 at 4:57 pm
Great write up - five stars. I bookmarked this page. I am promoting my blog which is based around the topic of men’s health and we are also promoting a few men’s sexual health related products like Vimax Pills, Vimax Extenders, Vimax Patches etc. Please check out my bog for more details.
February 2nd, 2010 at 7:44 am
adding to twitter this is great info.
March 28th, 2010 at 12:23 am
Greetings from London. This is a cool site. I’m wondering if you have any advice about staying out of the friend zone with women? Honestly I’m sick of girls telling me they just want to be friends. Maybe I’m being too much of a nice guy?
April 20th, 2010 at 2:56 pm
This blog write-up gave me a whole load of ideas, many thanks for sharing