If you would like to comment on a particular block, click on the pale blue bar to the left of the text. If you would like to view the comments on a particular block, click on the speech balloon.

A reintroduction of exchange controls

“A way of applying the brakes when the exchange rate is moving to far in the wrong direction.”

2. How does it fit with Compass’ core beliefs of equality, solidarity, democracy, freedom, sustainability and well being?

Not a reintroduction of Exchange Controls circa 1979, but a series of controls based on something called the tripwire and speedbump approach with the intention of keeping the pound stable. It involves imposing a restriction (speedbump) on foreign exchange based on an occurrence (tripwire) in the foreign exchange market (such as the exchange rate dropping to a certain level). It will help to keep the currency stable and protect our economic wellbeing from the fluctuations of international finance, something that I believe is very much in tune with Compass’ core beliefs.

3. How does it build the institutions of social democracy, like social groups and collective and cooperative forms of ownership and control?

Takes an important lever of economic control and put’s back in the hands of our elected representatives. Economics is not some science where an optimum solution is always present but a series of tradeoffs with winners and losers. It should be the people through their elected representatives who decide such things, not the invisible hand of the market.

4. How much will it cost or raise and where will any cost come from?

There will be a cost although this should not be excessive, certain speedbump measures such as exit and entry taxes (a tax on foreign exchange) should make it largely self financing.

5. Which groups in the electorate are likely to support or oppose this measure? Is there any polling evidence you have on this?

The city, who lobbied for the scrapping of these measures in the first place are likely to be opposed, the manufacturing industry is likely to be broadly in favour. The general public are likely to be undecided since it is quite complex area of economic policy.

6. Is there a place or country where it’s worked? Please provide some information.

It was practiced in almost all western democracies (with the exception of the US) for a number of years after World War 2. It played a vital role in helping Malaysia weather the Asian financial crisis in 1997 where it rapidly brought capital flight to a halt.

It has also been practiced in India and China where it has been vital in ensuring that foreign money is put to productive use and not used for speculative purposes.

7. What are the three main arguments in favour/against it?

In favour:
It gives our elected politicians more control over our economic wllbeing.
It provides economic stability which is good for long term business growth.
It has the potential to combat some forms of tax evasion such as transfer pricing.

Against:
It is not accepted by the IMF
It goes against the grain of current trends in economic policy and is therfore not readily accepted as a viable idea.
It has the potential if used irresponsible to be used for “beggar thy neighbour” purposes.

microsoft office 2007 email user free Pinnacle Studio 12 Ultimate microsoft windows xp restore sound pinnacle studio 11 trial version Microsoft Money 2007 Deluxe microsoft office power point download exploring microsoft office 2000 Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac microsoft office system professional download free for microsoft office 2000 professional edition Microsoft Office 2007 Enterprise download microsoft office 2003 proofing tools microsoft office release date Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 2000 code microsoft office serial change icons in microsoft windows Microsoft Works 9 microsoft office works download